|
91
« Last post by Bryan Blatchford on February 14, 2020, 04:10:33 pm »
Very cool looking racegun.
92
« Last post by Zapata on February 12, 2020, 08:16:49 am »
The internet is rife with essays by self-styled firearm experts who seem hell-bent on disparaging various legacy platforms for all manner of supposed deficiencies—despite the fact that those same guns are held in high regard by large numbers of satisfied users. Such differences of opinion are understandable given the fact that each of us has a uniquely individual set of experiences, knowledge and preferences that informs our choices.
One platform that seems to be a magnet for criticism is the M14 rifle. In fact, some call it out as an ideal example of failure with explanations such as: “It’s too heavy and too long. It was the shortest-lived service rifle in U.S. history and was only adopted because the process was corrupt. It was unsuccessful in singlehandedly replacing the M1 Garand, M1903 Springfield, M1917 Enfield, M1 Carbine, M3 submachine gun, M1928/M1 Thompson, and M1918 Browning automatic rifle.”
Of those claims, the first is purely subjective, the last represents an unrealistic goal and those that follow are arguable, considering that the rifle still sees some military service today and that the parties involved in its adoption are no longer with us. More to the point, none of the complaints are relevant to a discussion of the merits available to the average rifleman by modern-day, semi-automatic M14 clones.
Springfield Armory continues to offer semi-automatic M1A rifles styled like a traditional M14.
Examples from such companies as Springfield Armory (whose corporate cornerstone is the trademarked M1A) LRB Arms, Bula Defense and James River Armory remain not only commercially viable, but are available in a wide variety of configurations, including polymer- and folding-stock and short-barrel models. And since most command the better part of two grand in price, that should answer any questions as to the value they hold in the minds of modern consumers.
At the risk of appearing to indulge in the same brand of myopic self-rationalization as the aforementioned “experts,” I’d like to suggest that the old warhorse is not only still worthy of consideration by today’s armed citizen, but is uniquely qualified as one of the best general-purpose rifle choices for uncertain times. Why? Because of six characteristics that lend it an undeniably attractive character.
Military Pedigree
Civilian firearms derived from military designs offer their users several advantages over those developed solely for the commercial market, and the M14-style rifle is no exception. Such designs are typically overbuilt as they are intended to suffer the exigencies of wartime abuse and neglect. They typically consist of separable subassemblies that ease cleaning and inspection and decrease parts loss.
Spare parts left over from military contracts eventually find their way into the civilian marketplace, which virtually ensures the user’s ability to keep the firearm in working order indefinitely. Provisions for the attachment of accessories such as optics, muzzle devices, bayonets, etc., and the on-board storage of cleaning equipment is another advantage. Finally, military firearms like the M14, because they are employed by wide-ranging user group, usually exhibit well-developed mechanical and ergonomic features.
Rugged Construction
The original M14 rifle was nearly devoid of polymers and nonferrous “light” metals or construction methods designed to shave a few ounces or favor inexpensive manufacture. Its parts are nearly all made from machined steel forgings—a process renown for longevity and durability. Its steel barrel threads into the receiver, which also provides the locking recesses for the two-lug steel bolt. The gun is basically a gas-operated bolt-action with a strong, simple mechanism that can withstand tens of thousands, if not a couple of hundred thousand, rounds of firing.
In fact, the improved drawings used to machine the receivers of today’s semi-automatic clones, whether from precision investment castings or forgings, along with improvements in metallurgy and quality control of bolts, barrels, gas cylinders and other parts, makes the current crop of civilian rifles even more reliable and refined, in some respects, than those the military had made by the U.S. Springfield Armory, Harrington & Richardson, TRW and Winchester.
Reliable Operation
Being an offshoot of the M1 Garand, and with aspects of its design perfected by none other than John C. Garand himself, the M14’s basic operating system had already proven itself throughout multiple theaters of World War II and in the Korean War before undergoing a baptism by fire in the Vietnam War. In fact, the gun’s detachable box magazine and piston-driven, gas cutoff mechanism were further refinements of the Garand’s more rudimentary en bloc clip and dog-legged, one-piece piston/operating rod.
Standing in distinct opposition to unsubstantiated claims about how the Garand-derivative family of arms is overly susceptible to the ingress of debris are reams of testimonials from G.I.s across a generation that praise the rifle’s performance across dramatically distinct climatic and terrain conditions. Given responsible care and lubrication and fed proper ammunition, today’s M14-style rifles, which include Ruger’s Mini-14 series, can be counted on work exactly as designed for many years.
Simple Ergonomics
Oftentimes, those who have intimate familiarity with one particular firearm platform, either through personal preference or professional service, have difficulty accepting another—and that’s understandable. But when one particular style of firearm or operating mechanism and one arrangement of controls becomes so sacrosanct that all others are deemed wrong, that becomes legalism, and such is the case with AR-style controls. The M14, by contrast, has quite usable controls in a slim, ergonomic platform. The M14-style rifle has a reciprocating charging handle on the right (ejection) side that’s simply an extension of its operating rod. It allows for positive chambering by a nudge of the heel of the hand.
In a compact package, the M14-style rifle offers numerous benefits in terms of ergonomics and handling, as exemplified by this Springfield Armory SOCOM16.
The bolt catch, which can be replaced with a commercial version that also acts as a release, is on the left side of the receiver. The safety lever isperated by the trigger finger, and it pivots into the triggerguard from the outside, ensuring that the trigger finger is off the trigger when going “on safe.” The design also ensures that the trigger finger comes away from the trigger momentarily when the lever is pivoted to the triggerguard’s outside before the finger returns to the trigger to go “on fire.” The magazine hooks and rocks into position with an audible “click,” and the magazine release is also centrally located. Windage and elevation adjustments do not require the use of tools. It is, overall, a simple, tried-and-true set of controls that rely mostly on gross motor skills.
Ingenious Design
Several aspects of the M14’s design make it stand out from the crowd. Its ingenious White expansion and cutoff gas system—with a separate piston that moves rearward to strike the operating rod—minimizes damage with a variety of bullet types and weights used in it. In addition, a valve on the gas cylinder allows the gas system to be manually turned off, resulting in what is essentially a straight-pull rifle that can be cycled faster than a traditional bolt-action, since all that’s required is to withdraw the operating rod handle to the rear and then simply release it, allowing the recoil spring to return the bolt into battery.
Also, the rifle has a feature that most newer guns, even military designs, no longer possess: a built-in guide that allows the magazine to be fed using stripper clips. Such clips present an efficient and lightweight option for carrying additional ammunition. Additionally, the attachment of either conventional or forward-positioned optics using a wide variety of bolt-on mounts is easy. Finally, few could successfully argue against the M14-style rifle’s excellent sights and trigger, both of which contribute to a level of accuracy that well serves most hunting and defensive roles.
Traditional Aesthetics
Rifles made of wood and steel have served remarkably well in both civilian and military circles for about seven centuries. Sure, for about as many decades, polymer and nonferrous metals have proven to offer some advantages—but primarily in weight savings, not longevity. So, when it comes down to it, there’s simply nothing fundamentally wrong with a traditionally styled rifle made of wood and steel.
Springfield Armory's new M1A Tanker blends classic aesthetics with a compact, shortened profile that provides for easy handling.
In fact, the appearance of such a gun could be an advantage during circumstances in which a more modern, tactical design might draw unwanted attention. With a flush-fit magazine and a shortened muzzle compensator, such as in Springfield’s recently released M1A, the Tanker, the M14-style rifle has a form factor that is significantly more svelte than the average modern sporting rifle, despite its greater weight.
For all of the above reasons and more, the M14-style rifle offers a level of utility and capability—all in an understated package—not commonly encountered in many more modern firearms. Is it the “perfect” rifle? By no means, but it is surely underestimated and underappreciated when objectively evaluated.
93
« Last post by Zapata on February 12, 2020, 08:07:20 am »
The NEW 2020 Full Race Gun, Single-Action Semi-Automatic Pistol, & Made For Open Division Competitions
The New 2020 TANFOGLIO'S Witness Domina Xtreme Is A New Series Of Witness Custom Pistols Currently In Use By Many Of The Winning Competition Shooters Worldwide.
Every Witness Domina Xtreme pistol is hand-tuned by the Master Gunsmiths from Tanfoglio's Custom Shop in Italy and coated with Industrial Ceramic Coating for longer life.
Features: Fully Equipped, Out Of The Box - Tuned With A Trigger Job From Tanfoglio's Custom Shop Special, Industrial Two-Toned Ceramic Coating, Coned Ported Barrel With Polygonal Rifling, Lighter, Ported Slide, Compensator, Ambidextrous Safety, Xtreme Aluminum Grips, Xtreme Hammer, Xtreme Adjustable S/A Trigger, Xtreme Guide Rod, Xtreme Firing Pin, Xtreme Firing Pin Safety, Xtreme Hammer Spring, Extended Mag Well, Scope Mount With Blast Shield, C-more Sight, Slide Racker Thumb Rest, Reversible Mag Catch, Large Slide Serrations For Ease In Operation. Included Are Domina Xtreme Optics: Benthley TSX6 & Optic Mount: 90005 Mount For Micro Dot Optic.
Ships With: Cleaning Set, Two Recoil Springs For Different Loads, & Four Spare Magazines With Xtreme Aluminum Base Pad.
94
« Last post by Zapata on February 12, 2020, 06:44:05 am »
“The M1 rifle is the greatest battle implement ever devised.”
That quote, from Gen. George S. Patton, Jr., was his opinion of the famous rifle that served U.S. military forces during World War II, the Korean War and to a limited extent, Vietnam. Beginning in 1936, it was the standard-issue service rifle of U.S. forces until 1957 when it was replaced by the select-fire M14. The M1 rifle was named for its designer, John Garand, who worked at the Springfield Armory in Springfield, Mass.
How much do you know about the M1 Garand? Take our 10-question quiz to find out. The answers are at the end, but don’t peek ahead—we’ll know!
1. True or False? The correct pronunciation of John Garand’s last name, and that of his rifle, rhymes with the word “errand.”
2. What caliber cartridge does the M1 Garand fire?
a. .308
b. .30/30
c. .30-06
d. .223
3. What type of action does the M1 Garand have?
a. Fully-automatic
b. Semi-automatic
c. Bolt
d. Pump
4. The M1 Garand is fed by a clip; how many cartridges can a clip hold?
a. Six
b. Eight
c. Ten
d. Twelve
5. To properly load an M1 Garand, a full clip is inserted into the rifle’s receiver from what direction?
a. From the top
b. From the bottom
c. From the left side
d. From the right side
6. When a clip becomes empty and automatically ejects from the M1 Garand, what distinctive metallic sound does it make?
a. Boing
b. Ping
c. Click
d. Thunk
7. The Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP) sells government-surplus M1 Garand rifles to qualified buyers; to qualify a person must provide proof of:
a. U.S. citizenship and age
b. Membership in a CMP-affiliated organization
c. Participation in a marksmanship or other firearms-related activity
d. Successful background check through the NICS System
e. All of the above
8. True or false? If you qualify to purchase an M1 Garand from the CMP, a rifle may be shipped to you directly (depending upon the state in which you live), without going through a Federal Firearms License holder.
9. The CMP maintains three retail stores that sell government-surplus M1 Garand rifles; which of the cities below is not one of those locations?
a. Port Clinton, Ohio
b. Talladega, Alabama
c. Los Angeles, California
d. Anniston, Alabama
10. Still today, the M1 Garand rifle remains in use and is highly sought after by what groups of people?
a. Military honor guards
b. Drill teams
c. Target shooters
d. Firearms collectors
e. All of the above
Answers
1. True
2. c. .30-06
3. b. Semi-automatic
4. b. Eight
5. a. From the top
6. b. Ping
7. e. All of the above
8. True
9. c. Los Angeles, California
10. e. All of the above
Scorecard
Well, how did you do?
• 1 to 5 answers correct: you’re a Private…keep shooting.
• 6 to 8 answers correct: you’re a Corporal…well done.
• 9 or 10 answers correct: you’re a Gunnery Sergeant…congratulations “Gunny!”
“The M1 rifle is the greatest battle implement ever devised.”
That quote, from Gen. George S. Patton, Jr., was his opinion of the famous rifle that served U.S. military forces during World War II, the Korean War and to a limited extent, Vietnam. Beginning in 1936, it was the standard-issue service rifle of U.S. forces until 1957 when it was replaced by the select-fire M14. The M1 rifle was named for its designer, John Garand, who worked at the Springfield Armory in Springfield, Mass.
How much do you know about the M1 Garand? Take our 10-question quiz to find out. The answers are at the end, but don’t peek ahead—we’ll know!
1. True or False? The correct pronunciation of John Garand’s last name, and that of his rifle, rhymes with the word “errand.”
2. What caliber cartridge does the M1 Garand fire?
a. .308
b. .30/30
c. .30-06
d. .223
3. What type of action does the M1 Garand have?
a. Fully-automatic
b. Semi-automatic
c. Bolt
d. Pump
4. The M1 Garand is fed by a clip; how many cartridges can a clip hold?
a. Six
b. Eight
c. Ten
d. Twelve
5. To properly load an M1 Garand, a full clip is inserted into the rifle’s receiver from what direction?
a. From the top
b. From the bottom
c. From the left side
d. From the right side
6. When a clip becomes empty and automatically ejects from the M1 Garand, what distinctive metallic sound does it make?
a. Boing
b. Ping
c. Click
d. Thunk
7. The Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP) sells government-surplus M1 Garand rifles to qualified buyers; to qualify a person must provide proof of:
a. U.S. citizenship and age
b. Membership in a CMP-affiliated organization
c. Participation in a marksmanship or other firearms-related activity
d. Successful background check through the NICS System
e. All of the above
8. True or false? If you qualify to purchase an M1 Garand from the CMP, a rifle may be shipped to you directly (depending upon the state in which you live), without going through a Federal Firearms License holder.
9. The CMP maintains three retail stores that sell government-surplus M1 Garand rifles; which of the cities below is not one of those locations?
a. Port Clinton, Ohio
b. Talladega, Alabama
c. Los Angeles, California
d. Anniston, Alabama
10. Still today, the M1 Garand rifle remains in use and is highly sought after by what groups of people?
a. Military honor guards
b. Drill teams
c. Target shooters
d. Firearms collectors
e. All of the above
Answers
1. True
2. c. .30-06
3. b. Semi-automatic
4. b. Eight
5. a. From the top
6. b. Ping
7. e. All of the above
8. True
9. c. Los Angeles, California
10. e. All of the above
Scorecard
Well, how did you do?
• 1 to 5 answers correct: you’re a Private…keep shooting.
• 6 to 8 answers correct: you’re a Corporal…well done.
• 9 or 10 answers correct: you’re a Gunnery Sergeant…congratulations “Gunny!”
95
« Last post by Zapata on February 11, 2020, 08:18:04 am »
Further revealing that their operative motive is political prejudice rather than public safety, the Michael Bloomberg-bought Virginia House of Delegates has escalated their direct attacks on law-abiding gun owners and your NRA. Astute readers will remember that earlier this year Delegate Dan Helmer (D-40) introduced HB 567, a bill calculated to shut down the NRA Range in Fairfax, Va. This week, the House of Delegates Public Safety Committee passed HB 264, which targets NRA’s high-quality firearms training.
HB 264 would limit law-abiding Virginians’ ability to obtain a Concealed Handgun Permit (CHP) by reducing the ways in which an applicant could demonstrate the requisite competence with a handgun.
At present there are a several ways to demonstrate this competence, which are enumerated in VA Code Ann. § 18.2-308.02. This includes:
Completing any National Rifle Association firearms safety or training course;
Completing any firearms safety or training course or class available to the general public offered by a law-enforcement agency, institution of higher education, or private or public institution or organization or firearms training school utilizing instructors certified by the National Rifle Association or the Department of Criminal Justice Services;
Completing any firearms training or safety course or class, including an electronic, video, or online course, conducted by a state-certified or National Rifle Association-certified firearms instructor;
HB264 would eliminate all reference to the National Rifle Association in § 18.2-308.02 and eliminate the training option outlined in the first bullet point entirely.
This means that the state would no longer by default recognize the firearm safety and training courses offered by NRA. Firearms instructors would be required to obtain an additional state certification from the Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) in order to offer classes that would satisfy the training requirement for a CHP. The legislation does not grandfather current NRA instructors from this requirement. At present, there are almost 3,000 NRA certified firearms instructors in the Commonwealth.
This change would be even more dangerous than it first appears. The DCJS firearm instructor certification requirements are set by regulation. This means that they can be altered by Virginia’s executive branch. Anti-gun politicians, like disgraced Gov. Ralph Northam and Secretary of Public Safety and Homeland Security Brian Moran, could increase the burdensome certification requirements without going through the General Assembly. This could choke off the availability of the DCJS firearm instructor certification, and therefore law-abiding Virginians’ access to the training necessary to exercise their Right-to-Carry.
HB264 would also eliminate the ability to acquire the requisite CHP firearms training through a video or online course.
These changes are designed to make it harder for law-abiding Virginians to access the firearms training required to exercise their Right-to-Carry. Reducing the number of individuals certified to provide CHP training and manner in which the training may be administered would limit the availability of such training - endangering those facing a threat that necessitates immediate access to a CHP. This reduction would also increase the costs of receiving training - creating a regressive economic burden that would disproportionately harm the poor and vulnerable.
These burdensome changes will not benefit public safety. For his book More Guns Less Crime, Economist John R. Lott attempted to measure the effects of burdensome Right-to-Carry training requirements. Lott determined that “The presence or length of training periods typically show no effect on crime…” Lott also found that an increase in training requirements and permit fees will lower the rate at which individuals obtain Right-to-Carry permits.
The Public Safety Committee’s attack on high-quality electronic, video, or online firearms training is especially luddite and nonsensical. The Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles offers online “driver improvement clinics” (sometimes court-ordered) that can determine whether or not a driver will be permitted to continue to operate a motor vehicle in the Commonwealth. Virginia’s premier public institutions of higher education, like the College of William & Mary, offer online degree programs.
Once again, the Bloomberg-bought House of Delegates has proven that their gun control agenda is about their own ugly political and cultural bigotries.
96
« Last post by Zapata on February 09, 2020, 07:42:51 am »
97
« Last post by Zapata on February 08, 2020, 10:17:06 pm »
98
« Last post by Zapata on February 06, 2020, 08:29:08 pm »
Three Conservative MPs clashed with Public Safety Minister Bill Blair Thursday over opposition claims that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau misled the Commons in an earlier question period bout over Liberal plans to bring in U.S.-styled “red flag” laws.
The legislation would open new avenues for citizens and abused women to access police or the courts for firearm seizures and license revocations in threatening situations.
The heated confrontation near the end of question period sparked Blair to suggest that Quebec Conservative MP Steven Blaney, a former public safety minister under the Harper government, was “unconscionable” after Blaney and the other Conservatives said existing law gives police, firearm officers and the courts plenty of grounds for gun seizures and licence revocations.
READ MORE: Liberal Red Flag plan panned by gun safety advocate and firearm lobby leader
The confrontation began in Wednesday’s question period when Trudeau told the Conservatives a new regime is needed because although police have the ability to remove firearms from a gun owner who presents a threat to themselves or others, they “cannot suspend the licence and prevent the person from acquiring new firearms.”
“That is what the red flag law is all about,” Trudeau said, sparking a loud and angry response from Conservatives, who believe the existing law is adequate.
It is unclear what Trudeau meant since sections in the federal Firearms Act and Criminal Code prescribe for police seizure of firearms as well as licence revocation in cases of gun threats or violence.
Blaney, the second of the three Conservatives to go after Trudeau and Blair, claimed federal law is already clear: police can suspend firearms licences and prevent someone with mental and health issues or links to crime from acquiring a firearm in the first place.
“The law is clear, so nothing needs to be changed,” he told Blair.
“Why attack honest citizens instead of tackling the real problem, street gang.”
The comment drew a hot response from Blair, a former Toronto police chief who spent his entire police career with the Toronto service.
“Anyone who suggests the constant threat that women in an abusive relationship face from the potential of firearms in the home, for anyone to suggest nothing needs to be done is unconscionable,” Blair said in response to Blaney’s position.
“The current law is very clear, if a firearm owner poses a threat, authorities can confiscate firearms and suspend licenses, preventing further purchases of firearms or possession,” Calgary Conservative MP Bob Benzen responded.
“If our public safety minister actually had a PAL (possession and acquisition licence) or an RPL (restricted possession and acquisition licence) he would already know this instead of trying to dig out [of this],” said Benzen, who represents Stephen Harper’s former riding.
“I will admit I’m not a recreational firearm user but I have actually enforced and used these laws to keep communities and people safe,” retorted Blair.
“What I can tell you, the authority that exists in law, the laws that are currently available, that enable law enforcement to seize firearms and to revoke licence are limited in their application, and it is only in the circumstances where reasonable and probable grounds exist, and it is only in circumstances where a seizure of a firearm has taken place that a firearm (licence) can be revoked,” Blair claimed.
“Let me be very clear, red flag laws save lives. I’ve actually used those sections of the Criminal Code to seize firearms in these dangerous situations, and I can also advise you Mr. Speaker of the limitations of those laws,” he continued.
“We know that the average assaulted woman in Canada is assaulted 25 times in a domestic relationship before the police are in fact called.”
Alberta Conservative MP Glen Motz, a former police inspector who served 35 years on the Medicine Hat police service, lodged a complaint with Commons Speaker Anthony Rota on Wednesday, claiming Trudeau had misrepresented the gun laws in force.
But as of Thursday Rota had not made any ruling by question period.
99
« Last post by Adam on February 06, 2020, 08:57:40 am »
We had a cold deer season this year, made a mistake by not taking a nice deer with crossbow during bow season. And then had to wait until the last day of Shotgun to take a small doe. Bucks were mega shy this year, I think the rut was late.
Used my new Savage 220f 20 gauge rifled slug gun. What a great gun. It can shoot out to 200 yards with a 4 inch type spread, however I feel comfortable in the max 150 yard range. At the 100 yard type range you can shoot 2 inch type spread with it. Which is pretty good IMO for a shotgun.
Took a small doe at 109 yards with it. It packs a punch with 1900fps and using a ballistic tip 260gr bullet.
100
« Last post by Zapata on February 06, 2020, 07:00:21 am »
The Webley revolver in .455 caliber was first adopted by the British military in November 1887 with the Service Mk I. This new pattern offered many innovations in revolver design. Many experts felt that hinged-frame actions could possibly blow open with the new higher-pressure smokeless cartridges. Changes in the design included a near-solid frame locking device that held up under the most strenuous combat conditions through two world wars.
Of the six standard Webley service revolver "Marks" adopted between 1887 and 1915, Webley made fewer Mark V revolvers than any other, and collectors consider them among the rarest in standard form. The British adopted the Mk V in December 1913, and it represented the last revolver change before the start of World War I.
Twenty thousand were ordered and delivered to the British military, beginning in September 1914. In its standard-issue form, the Mk V had a 4-inch barrel and weighed just a half-ounce more than the Mk IV, which had been in service since 1899. The extra weight was due to the increased mass of the cylinder, which was beefed up to withstand the pressures of non-blackpowder cartridges.
All Webley service revolvers offer the collector a myriad of modifications and markings. Most Mk V revolvers can be found with the standard 4-inch barrels, but there are also 6- and 7.5-inch barrel lengths. A wide variety of military and unit markings aid the collector in making the revolver talk about its rich history and use.
Before the 1968 Gun Control Act prevented importation, tens of thousands of Webley service revolvers were offered in the pages of American Rifleman for prices as low as $19.95. Thousands were cut to accept the more prevalent American .45 ACP cartridge, which was used with half or full moon clips to hold the rimless rounds. This cutting was a relatively easy procedure to perform and involved turning a few millimeters off the face of the cylinder to allow space for the .45 ACP cartridge and its moon clip to clear the frame.
Cut Webleys do not bring the collectors' premium that uncut examples fetch. One can identify a shaved cylinder by inspecting the face of the chambers. The face of an uncut cylinder presents an inspector's view mark, broad arrow and/or inspector's proof in-between the chambers. All Webleys were issued with matching frame and cylinder serial numbers. The cylinder serial number is found on the outer edge of the cylinder side. An uncut cylinder displays a full number without any erosion to the full figure of the number.
The particular specimen shown above is a standard-issue military revolver marked "MARK V" and dated "1914" on the frame. It is uncut, bearing an official military de-accession mark of two broadhead-tipped arrows closed point to point. A unit marking on the backstrap indicates issue to the 2nd Royal Engineers, and it has approximately 75 percent of its original blue finish. Webley Mk V revolvers were manufactured between 1913-1915 and appear in a serial-number range between 129,900-215,000.
According to the 40th Edition Blue Book of Gun Values, Mk V service revolvers range in value from $500 in 60-percent condition to $1,800 or more in 100-percent condition. Add 10-percent value for 6" barrel service revolvers and 20-percent value for commercial revolvers, distinguished by a "C" in a square box on the left side of the frame.
|
Liberal gun buyback
by Zapata
March 07, 2026, 08:31:44 am
|
Toronto Police launce new program
by Zapata
July 28, 2023, 10:05:53 am
|
How accurate is this
by Zapata
November 11, 2021, 05:55:54 am
|
The fool and your guns
by Zapata
November 10, 2021, 06:24:36 am
|
Time to get things right.
by Zapata
June 22, 2021, 07:54:51 pm
|
USA gun control
by Zapata
June 21, 2021, 06:00:34 am
|
Provincial CFO
by Zapata
May 16, 2021, 06:55:54 am
|
Carbon fibre, pros/cons
by Zapata
February 08, 2021, 09:12:54 am
|
Machine Gun
by Zapata
February 06, 2021, 06:51:22 am
|
Hornady ARC, flattest cartridge
by Zapata
January 18, 2021, 08:12:39 am
|
|
|
Home
Forum
Search
Members
Login
Register
Recent Posts